| 
					
			
			
			
			
			
				
| 
 
	
	| 8. From the Fourteenth Century to the Renaissance |  |  
 
		
			| Towards the end of the 13th century and in the early 14th
				century the contrasts between the popolo minuto (middle and lower
				middle classes) and the popolo grasso (wealthy merchants) were
				accentuated. The latter had a firm grip on the power, since the
				Priors were chosen exclusively from representatives of the Arti
				maggiori, who also held the majority in the Councils of the
				Republic. In the 14th century the popolo minuto tried several
				times to broaden the democratic base of the government by
				increasing the participation of the Arti minori in the
				government. In 1378, under the impulse of a movement set in
				motion by the proletariat led by a wool-carder, Michele de Lando,
				the popolo grasso were obliged to accept an institutional reform
				which not only extended the right to elect one of their
				representatives as Prior to all the guilds but also provided for
				the constitution of three new Guilds (Tintori, Farsettai, Dyers,
				Corseteers and Ciompi: the revolt was to take its name from
				latter) corresponding to the most humble activities and the
				workers.But due to internal divergent interests and an incapacity
				to govern, the pepole minute was unable to withstand the reaction
				of the large merchant middle classes which soon once more took
				over power.
 The rivalry between the Donati family which had become noble and
				the Cerchi family resulted in much dissension and led to the
				formation of two antagonistic groups of political factions to be
				known as Neri and Bianchi or Blacks
  and Whites. The
				former were generally exponents of the "gente nova dai
				subiti guadagni" (newcomers with easy profits) such as the
				Cerchi, who had recently come from the country and had quickly
				made a fortune. The Neri, under the guidance of Corso Donati
				grouped together the representatives of the old noble classes and
				the most intransigent Guelphists. The two parties took turns at
				the priorate in the last decade of the 13th century but from then
				on the conflict was intensified. The Priors were forced to exile
				the heads of the two factions, and the situation precipitated.
				The Neri invoked the intervention of the pope who sent as his
				peacemaker Charles of Valois, the brother of Philip Le Belle,
				king of France. He openly favored the Neri, and even had the heads of the Bianchi
				arrested and forced those who were most compromised, including
				Dante Alighieri, into exile.
 In addition to these internal struggles, the city had also to
				sustain the onerous burden of the wars against the powerful
				Ghibelline signorias of the Visconti and the Scaligeri, joined by
				the Pisans and the Luccans. The "foreign" policies of
				the merchant classes were aimed at maintaining the Guelph
				alliance which reunited "a military force, an economic power
				and a spiritual and moral power that all complemented each other
				perfectly" (Y. Renouard). Two serious defeats (Montecatini,
				August 29, 1315 and Altopascio, Sept. 23, 1325) induced Florence
				first to ask for the protection of the Angevin troops
				(accompanied by the government of a viceroy of King Robert's),
				then to place themselves under the direct dominion of the house
				of Anjou, in the person of Charles, duke of Calabria. The death
				of the duke in 1327 unexpectedly restored its freedom to the
				Florentine Commune. But it did not end there.A new attempt to
				take over Pisa and Lucca failed miserably. The Florentines,
				defeated by the Ghibelline forces under the leadership of the
				lord of Verona, Martino della Scala (1339), were once more forced
				to ask King Robert for aid. This resulted in a brief tyranny by a
				viceroy of the king, Gualtierio di Brienne, duke of Athens, who
				even succeeded in getting himself nominated lord for life. The
				tyranny ended on July 26, 1343, on the day of Saint Anne, and the
				people, tired of violence and abuses of power, threw out the
				tyrant and restored the civic liberties.
 During the 14th century, internal strife and wars were aggravated
				by famine and epidemics (particularly deadly the plague of 1348)
				which made a situation that was already precarious even more
				grievous. It was a period of decisive juncture common to all
				Western economy. Further damage was caused by the disastrous
				flood of 1333 which also swept away all the bridges over the Arno
				except the Rubaconte. The 14th century was therefore a century of
				political and economic crisis, apart from the fact that epidemics
				reduced the population by half. The crisis was also reflected in
				the city's architectural activity which continued at a much
				slower pace than before. The buildings that saw the light in the
				14th century, even if on the whole greatly inferior to those of
				the preceding century, were nonetheless outstanding achievements
				and the expression of a precise cultural will on the part of a
				ruling class which disposed of a productive structure with a
				noteworthy capacity for the accumulation of capital. From the
				point of view of town planning the city settled into the form
				already established by the developments of the 13th century.
				Building activity turned first of all to finishing the great
				undertakings of the end of the 13th century (the walls, the
				cathedral, the Palazzo della
				Signoria, the large monastic complex) and to reconstructing
				the bridges which had been destroyed.
  The first of
				these to be rebuilt, between 1334 and 1337, was the Ponte alla
				Carraia, apparently after a design by Giotto. The reconstructions
				of the other bridges, from the Ponte Vecchio on, were based on
				this bridge. The Ponte Vecchio built by Taddeo Gaddi in three
				sweeping arches with a road much wider than before. Also the
				Loggia dei Lanzi and the church Orsanmichele
				were built at the same. After the impressive expansion of the
				13th century, the city began to take shape and what might be
				called a real town planning policy attempted to provide the
				inchoate building fabric with some degree of order and
				regularity. Throughout the 14th century one provision after
				another was taken in an effort to broaden the streets or modify
				their routes; to tear down ramshackle buildings or those with
				superstructures (such as projection or external stairs) wich
				impeded traffic. The main scope of the Commune's town planning
				policy (widen and straighten the streets) was on the whole
				successfully accomplished in the sector that lay between the last
				two city walls, but was much more difficult in the older heart of
				the city. Public intervention, at least in most cases, was based
				on considerations of "decorum". "For the greater
				beauty of the city" new piazzas were created or renovated;
				it was decreed that the houses were to have a stone facing on
				their lower part, certain activities were prohibited because they
				were antihygienic; unhealthy areas were to be reclaimed.
				Naturally the Commune's first obligations were in the
				reorganization of the city's two principal piazzas (Piazza della
				Signoria and the area around the complex of Cathedral and Baptistery, which required the
				demolition of various structures) as well as the broadening of
				the Via de' Calzaioli to unite the two piazzas. As can often
				still be seen, the buildings that line this street have a facade
				with rough-hewn blocks of pietraforte at least in the bottom
				part, and a series of regular arches in correspondence to the
				ground floor, features that had already appeared in some of the
				buildings in the Piazza della Signoria and in those set behind
				the apse of the Duomo. Loggias
				and large arcades were frequently used in civil architecture of
				the 14th century where the ground-floor rooms served as
				warehouses or shops and the vaulted loggias were reserved for the
				official family ceremonies. The patrician building of the 14th
				century, the best example of which is the Palazzo Davanzati, built by the
				Davizzi around 1330, has by now lost all pretense of being an
				offensive or defensive structure. The size kept increasing, where
				possible, and the ground plan of the palaces expanded to include
				courtyards and even small green areas inside. The revetment, of
				rusticated pietra forte for the lower floors, became smoother on
				the upper part where rhythmic rows of arched windows were
				inserted. The typical "Florentine" arch consisted of a
				roundheaded or flat intrados and a slightly pointed extrados. |  
 
 
 
 |  |  |